Author: CLiebert
Date: 11:45:17 10/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 1999 at 12:38:52, Antonio Dieguez wrote: >On October 06, 1999 at 11:56:47, Fernando Villegas wrote: > >>I wonder if some credit can still be given to the promise that after a while >>Little Goliath will be replaced by the big brother, a real, awesome, full size >>Goliath. I wonder if ever Big Goliath existed anyway. Maybe the author is >>waiting a natural growing of the actual little thing to become the big one? Some >>day Little Goliath will get enough stature as to be considered the big one? >>If that is the plan, I have serious doubts it can ever be accomplished. Little >>Goliath is strong, but not more strong and by the way not more knowleadgeable, >>not more attractive and no more special than any other fast searcher; in fact a >>lot less than Junior, that being a fast searcher is also a very very strong >>program, with positional acumen. And also is less interesting than Fritz, >>another fast searcher with infinite features and awfully play, not just strong. >>I do not say this because I have score against LG and I feel proud and arrogant. "Goliath" will be totaly different to LG2000, knowledge-based and not a fast searcher. Michael himself said that LG2000 has nothing special, it is a very simple program. Christian
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.