Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 05:20:28 10/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 1999 at 06:39:28, Ratko V Tomic wrote: >>>Apparently in that book Berliner's theory "refutes" the 1.e4 opening move. >>>Did anyone read the book? >> >> >> Every GM/IM I know of that has read the book has said "garbage". > >Well, the review did make it sound weird. But, one never knows. What if some >day, when computers have at least part of the tablebase for the initial >position, or can otherwise practically solve the game with some other algorithm >not thought up yet, and it turns out that the 1.e4 is sub-optimal (or maybe even >a losing move). How many decades or centuries did "experts" laugh at Copernicus >or Gallileo. Not as long as IM/GM players will laugh at this 'system'. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.