Author: Gareth McCaughan
Date: 05:36:12 10/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
[Ratko Tomic:] > Well, the review did make it sound weird. But, one never knows. What if some > day, when computers have at least part of the tablebase for the initial > position, or can otherwise practically solve the game with some other > algorithm not thought up yet, and it turns out that the 1.e4 is sub-optimal > (or maybe even a losing move). How many decades or centuries did "experts" > laugh at Copernicus or Gallileo. "They laughed at Galileo. They laughed at Einstein. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown."
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.