Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 07:20:28 10/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 1999 at 10:05:37, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On October 09, 1999 at 06:05:01, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>>whatever it is, i am sure tiger has the chance to lead the ssdf-list for >>>months. > >>I think that Tiger will be #1, Junior permitting. You underestimate Junior. > >NO. I have junior here. I watch the games. i see no good games. nor good >results. i refer to my data. i do not underestimate it. its weaker than >tiger. i wonder how you get your results. you should maybe better use >equal hardware if possible. >if not possible even 8 games are not enough. or somethings wrong with your >machines. or the time control 30/60 is too fast to relate it to 40/120. >whatever. it does not reflect the playing strength related to the ssdf-ratings >i discussed in this thread. your 3-5 is strange. Or the world upside down... :) That a program running on a machine that is twice as slow loses to Junior by 3-5 is normal. That Tiger 12 scored a total of 57% on this same slower machine against H732, N732, F532 and J5 is not "normal". It is an extraordinary performance. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.