Author: blass uri
Date: 08:56:33 10/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 1999 at 10:05:37, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On October 09, 1999 at 06:05:01, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>>whatever it is, i am sure tiger has the chance to lead the ssdf-list for >>>months. > >>I think that Tiger will be #1, Junior permitting. You underestimate Junior. > >NO. I have junior here. I watch the games. i see no good games. nor good >results. i refer to my data. i do not underestimate it. its weaker than >tiger. i wonder how you get your results. you should maybe better use >equal hardware if possible. >if not possible even 8 games are not enough. or somethings wrong with your >machines. or the time control 30/60 is too fast to relate it to 40/120. >whatever. it does not reflect the playing strength related to the ssdf-ratings >i discussed in this thread. your 3-5 is strange. Enrique did not say that Junior is not weaker than tiger The opposite. He thinks that tiger will be #1 I think that he meant by "You underestimate Junior" only to the fact that you mentioned Hiarcs,Fritz,Nimzo and did not mention Junior. The ssdf results suggest that Junior is weaker than Fritz532,Nimzo99,Hiarcs732 but the statistical error is too small to be sure about it. The 5-3 result is not so strange. Junior(p200) was leading against Hiarcs732(p200) 6:2 and lost the match so the result does not say that tiger12.0(PII300) is worse than Junior5(PIII500) in 30 minutes/60 moves games. It seems to me that tiger12 is clearly better than Junior5 and the other chessbase programs and the only question is if tiger will be better than Junior6 or deep Junior. We will have to wait and see. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.