Author: James B. Shearer
Date: 22:45:22 10/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 1999 at 00:10:19, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>On October 09, 1999 at 23:26:16, James B. Shearer wrote:
>
>> I'm not playing 5 0 because I like it, this is the only time control
>>your formula allows me to play (I also played a few 2 1 games a while ago but
>>this really is kind of hopeless especially with the interface I'm using and my
>>rating got knocked out of range). I expect I would do a bit better at 3 3 or
>>1 6.
>>
>> <deletions>
>
>It should play almost anything from 5 3 on down (blitz) or any standard time
>control up to 30 30. Is something broken that I don't know about?
I believe if you check your formula for scrappy you will find it will
play rated games if you are within 400 rating points at a variety of time
controls but will only play 5 0 unrated. Since I am a bit more than 400 rating
points lower than scrappy I can only play unrated 5 0 games.
<deletions>
>All I can say about speed is that on the quad P6/200, it runs about 400K
>nps normally, with blips to 500K+ in endgames. However, it taking an unusual
>amount of time on one move doesn't guarantee that it 'failed low' at all
>when the machine gets loaded. Unfortunately I now can't tell exactly as the
>automatic script that cleans out old log files has run and deleted all those
>logs...
Perhaps you should save the logs for losses (at least for a while).
This shouldn't take much space if they are really few and far between.
James B. Shearer
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.