Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 12:49:09 10/10/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 1999 at 15:35:53, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >It is not very active, it likes to play cat and mouse without doing much until >it sees something in the search, but it is very efficient. I do have a different opinion. the games i get are different from yours. tiger plays in all games very active and having initiative. it forces the wins. it makes the game.- do you test a different program ? older tiger versions were passive. not 11.2 and not 12.0. >I start thinking of >it as the opposite of CST in every way. ?? >I guess that if someone likes CST or >Mchess won't like Tiger so much, and viceversa. Do you agree? Now that I think >of it, Thorsten likes both, CST and Tiger, so I may be wrong. I like the games. it is not important HOW a program gets a beautiful game, it is important THAT it plays beautiful chess games. i am not interested in games that are dump, produced by dump programs. by boring games between junior-fritz or nimzo-fritz or whatever. i am interested in planful games . hiarcs and mchess and ctiger and rebel and virtual and cstal and and and produce those interesting games. this is what i like. i do not understand why your tiger plays cats and mice and not active. strange.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.