Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 14:10:17 10/10/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 1999 at 16:21:28, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 10, 1999 at 11:57:48, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>On October 10, 1999 at 11:38:46, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>On October 10, 1999 at 03:50:04, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >>> >>>>>>The result is 2-2 ,here are the games : >>>>> >>>>>SNIP >>>>> >>>>>>Pierre >>>>> >>>>>What were the time controls? >>>> >>>>I writing ... >>>> >>>>22.09.1999 >>>>7th France-ch 99 will take place on Satuday the 9th october, and Sunday the 10th >>>>of october, with between 15 an 20 french chess programs competing in this 7 >>>>round tournament. There will be also a key event on satuday night : an >>>>exhibition match between the strongest french chess player, IGM Joel LAUTIER and >>>>4 french chess programs (Chess Tiger, Anmon, Capture and ZChess). The IGM will >>>>play the 4 program simultaneously, he will have 2h30/game vs 1h30/game for the >>>>program. >>>> >>>>More information under >>>>http://www.clichy-echecs.org/itras99.htm. >>>> >>>>Thanks Franck Zibi for this information ! >>>> >>>>Kind regards >>>>Frank >>> >>>2h30 is more than rapid chess, but when playing 4 programs it is like playing >>>rapid chess. I believe that almost no player could escape without at least one >>>loss in such an event. >> >>Yes, but here play an GM with 2638 ELO ! This results from AnMon and Chess Tiger >>are fantastic ! >> >>And Harald ... >> >>The game is genial (position and tactic). >>Make an analyse with your favorit program and you can see that AnMon play >>fantastic moves ! >> >>Kind regards >>Frank > > >Think about this. the GM had 150 minutes on his clock. He was playing 4 >programs out of that pool of time. Which turns into almost game/40 type >time control from his perspective. With one _HUGE_ difference. The GM >was having to keep track of 4 games at once, which is significantly harder >than to play a single game/40 game. > >I think the GM did wonderfully well considering that. I have seen similar >type events where the GM got shredded at that time control. It isn't >unexpected at all... > >If I had been playing him with 4 copies of Crafty at the same time, I would >not have been happy with a 2-2 split, at all... Not at that fast time >control. Yes I think also. When I play with 2000 ELO against 4 people with 1800 ELO is this result (2:2) and very good result for me ! Absolutely correct ! Bob, the game is complete fantastic. Bishop Be2 and Be3 (positionel), h4 and then e4 or 0-0-0 ! I think move 15. ... g5 is the problem from Lautier ! And here I think that the GM play very agressive against an tactical monster ! Lautier play good moves not fatal errors ! The question for me is ... In this position (move 15) I think Lautier played against Fritz not g5 :-) Comet played last year an tournament with an rating over 2700 ELO. The best resultat from an computer chess programm (I think). I will say that many amateurprograms beat GMs in tournaments. Or Chess Wizard last year, SUPER results ! And when my favorit football team (SG Wattenscheid 09) win against Bayern München (OK, the last match 1:7) is this nice and I am happy ! Kind regards Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.