Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 09:35:50 10/12/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 12, 1999 at 12:19:07, Christopher R. Dorr wrote: >The simple fact is that CM7K (and 8K and 9k ad infinitum) is targeted at the >average computer owner who wants a game of chess now and then. This customer has >*no* need for a stronger engine (CM4K could and still can whump 99.999% of the >general public), Hi: You are right, but let me add this: even us, the so called "professional" amateurs, are already busted by current engines, so we do not need, either, more power in them, but more tutorials of better quality aimed to middle class player, people like me far above common folk in playing strenght, but far less strong that real professional chess player. That is the niche is lacking. And that is not covered by CM neither by Rebel or Schreder or any other. I have emailed about this to Ed with detailed ideas about that and he said to me -I hope not only because of his kindness- that my ideas were powerful, but difficult to implement. Well, difficult or not, the path of future goes by that way. We do not need more strenght -but if they give us, OK- but a better trainning device, not so much, like today, based in our use of existent features, but a more compelling one, like to have a master looking at our games over our shoulders. Fernando an opening book editor (the general public doesn't need one), >RS-232 autoplayer support, or any of the things we as afficianados look for. > >It's a simple equation. It would cost more to develop these features than it >would benefit them to do so. An extra 100 or 1000 or 5000 units would not offset >the cost of developing these, and these are the numbers being affected by the >changes you suggest. If I owned a mass-market program, and looked at these >numbers, I wouldn't do it either. > >Cm7K is for the masses. Fritz 6 and Rebel and Genius are targeted towards us. >There is *no* chance that a CMxK will ever compete feature for feature with >these programs (in terms of professional features), just as there is no chance >that these will compete feature for feature with CMxK in terms of gimmicks, >tutorials, interface frills, etc. Completely different audiences, so completely >different programs. And all the email to Mattel in the world won't change it. >Unfortunately. > >Chris
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.