Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: DB will never play with REBEL, they simple are afraid no to do well

Author: Amir Ban

Date: 15:51:25 10/12/99

Go up one level in this thread


On October 11, 1999 at 21:25:30, Manuel Rodriguez Blanco wrote:
>

snip

>Rebel Company about the accusations:
>
>
>We were not aware of any restriction that playing against Deep Blue Junior was
>forbidden. Deep Blue Junior was there and we took the opportunity to find out
>more about this program. The result was posted as NEWS no more no less and we
>don't have (nor had) any intention to include Rebel's victory over Deep Blue
>Junior in our advertisements.
>
>
>We can't confirm the "one second" time control of Deep Blue Junior. Deep Blue
>Junior indeed played on a "one second" time control using its default time
>control but raising the time control caused Deep Blue Junior to think a lot
>longer (up to 10-15 seconds).
>

This point is important, and I didn't see it discussed. If so, Hsu is
misinformed about what features were made available to users of DBjr, and Rebel
played a version that was much stronger than he thought. I don't remember if
they played equal time controls, but if they did, it may well be that the
contest was fair or close to fair (we need to assume that the DBjr server was
not overloaded, which to me seems likely, because it was hardly used intensively
at the stations I saw in Paderborn).

I wouldn't consider Rebel beating DBjr a surprise. Even assuming full-DB to be
the equal of Kasparov (doubtful), DBjr should be much weaker, and not more than
Rebel. Besides, isn't Rebel's record against rated players better than DBjr's ?
I don't know the statistics, but I got the impression that DBjr's record is not
too good.

I think it's pretty low to say or imply that Ed played DBjr for cheap publicity.
Obviously he did that out of curiosity. It would make better business sense to
concentrate on the WCCC rather than play improvised games in the hall, but
people who are curious do what is intersting, not important. It's clear from Hsu
& Campbell's letter and the clarification from Friedel that they are not curious
in the least, and that they don't give a damn about their peers respect. That's
a good enough reason not to respect them, and I don't.

Amir




This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.