Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 23:18:03 10/12/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 13, 1999 at 01:54:20, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 12, 1999 at 19:55:06, odell hall wrote: > >>On October 12, 1999 at 18:07:02, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On October 12, 1999 at 16:27:35, odell hall wrote: >>> >>>>On October 12, 1999 at 15:30:07, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 12, 1999 at 14:39:25, odell hall wrote: >>>>>[snip] >>>>>>Let me ask this Dr. Hyatt ? Is there a Reason why Ed Schroeder Should Take your >>>>>>word for it that the Deepblue he played at paderborn Was not the "real Deepblue" >>>>>>? Are you a member of the Deepblue Team? Or what is your special relationship To >>>>>>Deepblue? If I was Ed, I would want to hear this news from Someone that I Knew >>>>>>was a representative of Deepblue and therefore had inside information about it. >>>>> >>>>>Actually, I am pretty sure that Dr. Hyatt is familiar with members of the Deep >>>>>Blue team. Furthermore, Deep Blue has already proven itself with competition >>>>>against computers, and beating the best player in the world in at tournament >>>>>time controls. Even in the first GK match, Deep Blue did very well. >>>>> >>>>>Now, it's possible that some microcomputer might really be stronger than Deep >>>>>Blue because we don't have thousands of games to know for sure. But as Wayne >>>>>says in _Wayne's World_ : "Yeah... And monkeys might fly out of my butt >>>> >>>> >>>> Well I was not claiming by any strectch of the imagination that rebel is >>>>stronger than deepblue. I do not believe this at all, not even close. But i do >>>>believe that rebel has the potential to beat deepblue a couple of games, and >>>>that Ed has a right to be proud of this and to publish it. He also has the right >>>>to doubt information coming from any other source other than the deepblue team. >>> >>> >>>Doubt all you want. Call me a liar if you want. It really doesn't matter one >>>hill of beans to me. I asked Hsu... he explained the 'box' playing at the WCCC, >>>I relayed that info here specifically saying that it came from him. If you >>>don't trust such statements, take a hike. >> >> >> >> Please Control yourself sir, I did not read your original reply to Ed schoeder >>concerning Deepblue, nor did I have any knowledge that Hsu specifically talked >>to you, I was speaking in general. This Deepblue issue tends to turn you into a >>raving manaic! Please take a deep breath and relax!! no one is calling you a >>liar. But even still I can see why Ed would want to hear this from the Deepblue >>team himself. Especially since everyone knows That you are overzealous for >>Deepblue, and I don't think you believe that their Crap stinks! > >Let's take your last statement above: > > "He also has the right to doubt information coming from any other source > other than the deepblue team." > >how _else_ would you take that? IE "Hyatt wrote an explanation about the DB >Jr machine in Paderborn, but if we don't hear this directly from the DB team >it ought to be discounted." is a pretty fair interpretation of what you wrote. > >That isn't calling me a liar? He could be calling you misinformed (which is something I doubt, FWIW.) Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.