Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: DB will never play with REBEL, they simple are afraid no to do well

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 16:57:30 10/13/99

Go up one level in this thread


On October 13, 1999 at 16:45:14, Jeremiah Penery wrote:

>On October 13, 1999 at 14:30:30, Ratko V Tomic wrote:
>
><snip DBx100>
>
>>In checkers, for example, Tinsley vs program Chinook, won the match by seeing
>>plans 35-40 plies long, which were far beyond Chinook (which could see around 20
>>plies ahead). Speeding up Chinook 100 or 1000 times wouldn't have made much
>>difference, since Chinook still couldn't see (not even remotely) what Tinsley
>>could.
>
>Didn't something like 70% of Chinook's searching _from the first position_ end
>in the TBs?  In these cases, Chinook was seeing *everything*.  Of course, as the
>game progressed, even more of its searches ended in the TBs.  Even though
>Chinook couldn't see as much as Tinsley in pure search, the TBs probably more
>than made up for it in this case.
>
>Jeremiah

Sometimes Chinook searches into the endgame tablebases from the end of its
opening book.  There are some opening lines that Chinook can prove are forced
wins/losses.  In the main, this isn't the case, though.

Andreas (Junghanns, Ph.D.) is working towards strongly solving checkers in the
time he has left at the U of A.

Dave



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.