Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 05:50:39 10/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 14, 1999 at 08:37:41, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On October 13, 1999 at 22:57:28, Carl McClain Morris, Jr. wrote: > >>I consistently run the Hiarcs Mark test for Hiarcs 732 on my IBM Aptiva PIII 500 >>megahertz machine and consistently score 375 plus or minus 0, max time set at >>600 seconds. Can you tell me how this translates into Elo rating? > >It doesn't, really. As far as SSDF goes, it'll be just a few points higher, if >any, than the top Hiarcs on the list (with 450Mhz hardware). > > >>Also, can you give me a practical example of what it means to adjust the hash >>relative to the time controls? > >With shorter games, you don't need so much hash. The program is searching many >less nodes in a shorter time control, so the hash doesn't get full. With a long >time control, the hash eventually fills up - this is where a bigger hash would >help. > >Jeremiah I get 228 on the short test and 354 on the long one, on my AMD K6-2 450. Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.