Author: Joshua Lee
Date: 08:03:44 10/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
>>>>I consistently run the Hiarcs Mark test for Hiarcs 732 on my IBM Aptiva PIII 500 >>>>megahertz machine and consistently score 375 plus or minus 0, max time set at >>>>600 seconds. Can you tell me how this translates into Elo rating? >>> >>>It doesn't, really. As far as SSDF goes, it'll be just a few points higher, if >>>any, than the top Hiarcs on the list (with 450Mhz hardware). >>> >>> >>>>Also, can you give me a practical example of what it means to adjust the hash >>>>relative to the time controls? >>> >>>With shorter games, you don't need so much hash. The program is searching many >>>less nodes in a shorter time control, so the hash doesn't get full. With a long >>>time control, the hash eventually fills up - this is where a bigger hash would >>>help. >>> >>>Jeremiah >> >>I get 228 on the short test and 354 on the long one, on my AMD K6-2 450. >> >>Tony > >These numbers will vary with the amount of Hash Memory you have set. So it's >hard to compare them without specifying the hash memory used for both the short >and long test. >Jim Walker On a K6-3 450 Short test with 1 MB 408 17.2 sec 58Kn Long test 1Mb 337 449.0sec Short test 35MB (best results on Hiarcs mark on machines with 64MB) 194 36.1sec 55Kns
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.