Author: Shep
Date: 09:03:50 10/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 14, 1999 at 11:12:39, Joshua Lee wrote: >I know that even if you had a 2Ghz machine it wouldn't solve Nolot pos 1 in >under 3 Min. In fact 10 complete in under 3 min you would have to have a 35Ghz >Machine. so the only solution seeing how this isn't going to happen for hmm >maybe 9 years you would think Moore's Law. So how can you make programs faster >annd more intellegent? I don't think a program has to solve all Nolot positions (or any other test suite) within tournament time control to have GM strength. I bet several GM's would not solve all of them (provided they didn't know them already which they do...) either. [Remember the notorious Qe3 which both Kasparov and Deeper Blue missed, yet most PC programs find it.] In fact, if a program found just 3 or 4 of them in 10 minutes, it would probably be at par with many GM's (unless it was tuned for the suite). --- Shep
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.