Author: pete
Date: 10:28:21 10/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 12, 1999 at 18:24:27, Will Singleton wrote: >On October 12, 1999 at 16:08:33, pete wrote: > >>Second game : Fortress out of book after 1. d4 nf6 2. c4 e6 :=) ; at move 23 >>fortress has about 17 minutes left , yet ... >> >>[Event "?"] >>[Site "Test match"] >>[Date "????.??.??"] >>[Round "?"] >>[White "Fortress1.61(PII300)"] >>[Black "CsTal2.03(P233MMX)"] >>[Result "1/2-1/2"] >> >>1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 d5 4. Nc3 Be7 5. cxd5 exd5 6. Qb3 c6 7. Bg5 Ne4 8. >>Bxe7 Qxe7 9. e3 Nxc3 10. Qxc3 Bf5 11. Bd3 Bxd3 12. Qxd3 Qb4+ 13. Qd2 Qxd2+ 14. >>Nxd2 Nd7 15. e4 O-O-O 16. f3 dxe4 17. Nxe4 Nf8 18. O-O-O Ne6 19. Rhe1 Rd5 20. >>Nc3 Rxd4 21. Rxd4 Nxd4 22. Re7 Rf8 23. Ne4 Nf5 24. Re5 Nh4 25. Re7 Nf5 26. Re5 >>Nh4 27. Re7 Nf5 1/2-1/2 >> >> >>This is really fun ! >> >>pete > >Fortress plays on fics as powerhouse, and has a blitz rating of 2163 on the same >cpu that you are running. Its standard rating is 1980. While I don't doubt >your results, they appear to reflect a fast time control rather than standard, >or some other problem. > >Will Hi Will, time control is 60/60 ; my CSTal definitely isn't broken ( which can be easily agreed on if I recover from laziness posting the results of the 2nd and now half finished results of 3rd round of my private "Endless Tourn". fortress simply did very well in these 2 games played ( the 2 first fortress games i have seen yet ) ; more games will show more . but its time management is indeed strange ( spending clearly more than 3/4 of its time on the first half of moves in both games ) and the opening book is indeed _very_ small. both games were fun to watch so i will definitely play more soon. pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.