Author: Wayne Lowrance
Date: 11:25:51 10/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 14, 1999 at 09:37:34, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On October 14, 1999 at 08:57:30, Pillsbury wrote: > >>Hi! >> >>Could anyone advise which of the following processors is better to handle >>programs like Fritz6 or Hiarcs 7.32? >> >> AMD K6 500 or PentiumIII 500 >> >>Whats the basic differences in these processors that affect users in all the >>other areas like multimedia etc.? >> >>Thanks in anticipation. >> >>karthick > >Hallo! > >AMD K6-2 is faster on average (clockwise). Comparison P3 vs AMD K6-2 > >Hiarcs is slightly faster on Pentium >Fritz is slightly faster on AMD >Junior and Nimzo is faster on AMD >Rebel is much faster on AMD >CST is very much faster on AMD >Crafty is much faster on Pentium > >AMD K6-3 is better to clearly better then K6-2 >AMD K6-3 is about 125% faster vs Pentium (T Szub) > >Athlon is about the same as AMD K6-3 for most chess-programs. > >Bertil SSDF Bertil I am interested in the AMD K7 Athlon @ 600 Mhz, do you have any test data ? I asked on a earlier post and received a thread where the Athlong was considerably faster than a P111 comparable with his program. What about the K7 700 mhz ? Wayne
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.