Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 09:33:25 10/15/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 14, 1999 at 11:03:44, Joshua Lee wrote: > >>>>>I consistently run the Hiarcs Mark test for Hiarcs 732 on my IBM Aptiva PIII 500 >>>>>megahertz machine and consistently score 375 plus or minus 0, max time set at >>>>>600 seconds. Can you tell me how this translates into Elo rating? >>>> >>>>It doesn't, really. As far as SSDF goes, it'll be just a few points higher, if >>>>any, than the top Hiarcs on the list (with 450Mhz hardware). >>>> >>>> >>>>>Also, can you give me a practical example of what it means to adjust the hash >>>>>relative to the time controls? >>>> >>>>With shorter games, you don't need so much hash. The program is searching many >>>>less nodes in a shorter time control, so the hash doesn't get full. With a long >>>>time control, the hash eventually fills up - this is where a bigger hash would >>>>help. >>>> >>>>Jeremiah >>> >>>I get 228 on the short test and 354 on the long one, on my AMD K6-2 450. >>> >>>Tony >> >>These numbers will vary with the amount of Hash Memory you have set. So it's >>hard to compare them without specifying the hash memory used for both the short >>and long test. >>Jim Walker > >On a K6-3 450 Short test with 1 MB 408 17.2 sec 58Kn >Long test 1Mb 337 449.0sec >Short test 35MB (best results on Hiarcs mark on machines with 64MB) 194 36.1sec >55Kns I used 102MB Hash Memory as suggested by the program. (I've got 128 RAM). Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.