Author: odell hall
Date: 12:28:59 10/15/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 1999 at 15:19:43, Paul Massie wrote: >It's worth keeping in mind that the Rebel hardware for three of those games was >relatively old and slow. Only the top game was played on a fast PC. That makes >Rebel's result look somewhat better. > >Paul > Yeah but the problem is I thought I heard larry kaufman saying that computers are grandmasters on Pent 200, and the ssdf list suggest the same, But after watching these Strong IM's I do not think I could believe this. Probally need a Amd 400 or better to get GM results. This leads me to another question. On what hardware are we measuring whatever Rebel is GM? If it played on a 486 would we factor in these results also? I am a little confused here? >On October 15, 1999 at 15:00:11, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On October 15, 1999 at 13:25:17, Howard Exner wrote: >> >>>Anyone have the scoop on this re-match? Watching the one game on the rebel page >>>but how are the other three games unfolding? >> >> >>Rebel won 1 game, lost 2, and drew 1.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.