Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 15:47:07 10/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 1999 at 10:58:33, blass uri wrote: >On October 17, 1999 at 10:05:44, Robert Hyatt wrote: > ><snipped> > >>How so? Dlugy is getting drubbed by computers on ICC. If he exaggerates >>downward, he only makes himself look worse, which I doubt he would do. > >The games on ICC are not tournament time control so it has nothing to do with >the fact that Dlugy is getting drubbed by computers on ICC. > sure it does. You just haven't heard the comments he has made, since you don't visit ICC. >> >>> Grandmaster Lev Albert said Deepblue was only "2500" do you believe >>>that he is right? >> >>Sure... and then that puts the micros at a more realistic 2100 rating. >>That makes perfect sense. > >Lev albert did not say that the difference between deepblue and micros against >humans is 400 elo so you cannot learn that micros are 2100 from his words. > >Uri If you believe him, then DT is 2500. we _know_ that DT won 9 of every 10 games vs micros (long time controls, based on 10 years of ACM events). what does 9/10 results say? nearly 400 rating points? Q.E.D. either he is wrong, or the micros are 2100. I don't believe micros are 2100 players... I think they are 300-350 points higher. IE if you pick the right set of 25 consecutive games from deep thought, you get a performance rating of about 2650. If you take _all_ games it played, including early deep thought versions with bugs, you get 2551. All of these are USCF ratings of course. Best guess is to subtract 50-60 to convert to FIDE. Either is impressive.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.