Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Only Genius 6.5? Not 7? More cause for Genius to be a fritz engine!!!

Author: Lawrence S. Tamarkin

Date: 18:23:30 10/19/99

Go up one level in this thread


What's the worry?  There are plenty enough ChessBase engines already, without us
chess software consumer's needing anything that has to do with Millaneaum,which
is more expensive anyway, without, IMO being better.  They have their own stable
of chess engines, that can be bought seperately, so I suppose their company will
profit alot (or a little), by the chess software public anyway.  And I'm sure
that Richard Lang has better things to do with his time than worry about the
state of his chess program, otherwise, I suspect he would have made some public
statements about it.  As a matter of fact, there are other great programs of the
past that I wonder about, like MChess.  Had/has a very original, aggressive
style with a very good opening book. Where did it go?

Larry


On October 19, 1999 at 20:33:42, Charles Unruh wrote:

>If the author only has had the time after this long of a period to upgade his
>prog from 6 to 6.5, I surely hope he considers selling his engine to Chessbase
>or to Rebel.  Why not make life easy on the chess program consumer?  :)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.