Author: blass uri
Date: 23:14:50 10/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 1999 at 22:01:51, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On October 21, 1999 at 17:25:58, blass uri wrote: > >>On October 21, 1999 at 14:30:46, Dave Gomboc wrote: >> >>>On October 21, 1999 at 12:09:18, Christophe Theron wrote: >>> >>>>On October 21, 1999 at 06:29:12, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 20, 1999 at 09:41:21, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>BTW: Tiger has NO agressive learning. It does not try to repeat won games. It >>>>>>just try to avoid repeating losses. This game appears twice only by bad luck... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Christophe >>>>> >>>>>In auto-232 play, isn't this a mistake? >>>>> >>>>>Dave >>>> >>>>Why? Because I could get easily some extra points by beating non-learning >>>>programs several times? >>> >>>No... because other programs will be attacking yours in that way, and if you're >>>otherwise equally strong, you'll score less than 50%. >> >>I do not understnad. >>Tiger does not repeat the same opening that it lost >> >>What is the reason that you expect tiger to score less than 50% in matches >>against them? >> >>Uri > >Tiger will not attempt to repeat the openings that it wins in. The question is if attempting to repeat these openings is going to help gainst program who do not repeat the openings that it is losing. Uri >Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.