Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 01:59:12 10/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 1999 at 23:33:20, Paulo Soares wrote: >I don't know any chess program that is good in this type >of analysis. I know a few ! Hiarcs, Shredder, ChessTiger, Rebel, Mchess... > All they make the same mistakes that Fritz6 did in >the example that you presented. If you want good analyses, use >the procedure man+machine, and for this better is " Infinite Analyses " >of the ChessBase engines. ?? the results have been made using infinite analysis. thats what i am talking about, that it makes not much sense to let fritz-like programs compute a long time on a move, since the result is not trustable only ONE ply after the long-analysis. > For not seeming that I am wanting to do >propaganda of ChessBase, I should say that already bought Rebel Century >and I intend to buy Tiger12 (Rebel Tiger), Schreder4 and Junior6, besides >already to have made the upgrade for Fritz6. Besides, I have Fritz5.32, >Genius6, Hiarcs7.0,Rebel10, Nimzo2000 and Hiarcs7.32. yup - me too. >I consider that you have not dates enough to say that Chesstiger and >other programs are much better than Fritz5 and Fritz6. ??? I consider that you are wrong and i have data that says that shredder and tiger are stronger programs than fritz5/fritz6 even before championship paderborn. >What leaves me more >impressed is that Thorsten Czub is considered an expert in computer chess, >definitively I don't understand your procedure. Definetely i don't understand your point at all. Which procedure ??? >Paulo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.