Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Evaluating Mobility

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 06:28:21 10/22/99

Go up one level in this thread


On October 22, 1999 at 00:18:37, KarinsDad wrote:

>On October 21, 1999 at 22:14:01, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>
>>On October 21, 1999 at 17:25:32, KarinsDad wrote:
>>
>>>The problem is not one of how many squares can a piece move to, but rather how
>>>many squares can a piece move to safely. Additionally, if you analyze GM games,
>>>you will notice that a square that does not really look safe, is safe due to
>>>some condition of the board. However, I just let the search engine take care of
>>>that one.
>>
>>The problem is even bigger than this, of course.  It doesn't really matter how
>>many squares a piece can safely move to, what matters is whether it can continue
>>to do something useful, or move to somewhere where it can do something useful.
>>
>>Dave
>
>Depending on the position, this is true.
>
>I look at a chess program as something with which you attempt to make moves
>while weakening your position the least and hindering your opponent's position
>the most. Mobility, especially in the opening and middlegame probably does that
>right behind material and possibly piece overprotection. There are probably more
>factors than we can even count and the weight of any given factor depends
>heavily on the position. But, with bitboards, I think that safe square mobility
>is something that can quickly be calculated, similar to material being quick to
>calculate.
>
>I consider it a positional tactic (due to the possibilities for future good
>moves it presents) as opposed to a material gain tactic and I consider the cost
>to calculate it small.
>
>KarinsDad :)


Here is a point to ponder:

Does having lots of mobility make the position "good"?  Or does a good position
have lots of mobility?  IE is mobility the 'cause' of a good position or is it
simply the 'effect' of a good position?

I believe the latter is closer to the truth. Otherwise, moves like a4 would
be _good_ moves because they instantly improve both the real and potential
mobility of the a1 rook.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.