Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 08:12:10 10/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 1999 at 02:14:50, blass uri wrote: >On October 21, 1999 at 22:01:51, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>On October 21, 1999 at 17:25:58, blass uri wrote: >> >>>On October 21, 1999 at 14:30:46, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>> >>>>On October 21, 1999 at 12:09:18, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 21, 1999 at 06:29:12, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On October 20, 1999 at 09:41:21, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>BTW: Tiger has NO agressive learning. It does not try to repeat won games. It >>>>>>>just try to avoid repeating losses. This game appears twice only by bad luck... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Christophe >>>>>> >>>>>>In auto-232 play, isn't this a mistake? >>>>>> >>>>>>Dave >>>>> >>>>>Why? Because I could get easily some extra points by beating non-learning >>>>>programs several times? >>>> >>>>No... because other programs will be attacking yours in that way, and if you're >>>>otherwise equally strong, you'll score less than 50%. >>> >>>I do not understnad. >>>Tiger does not repeat the same opening that it lost >>> >>>What is the reason that you expect tiger to score less than 50% in matches >>>against them? >>> >>>Uri >> >>Tiger will not attempt to repeat the openings that it wins in. > >The question is if attempting to repeat these openings is going to help gainst >program who do not repeat the openings that it is losing. > >Uri >>Dave It depends on how radically the opening is avoided by the loser, I suppose. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.