Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 10:14:55 10/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 1999 at 08:56:21, blass uri wrote: >On October 21, 1999 at 16:05:36, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On October 21, 1999 at 14:23:59, Dave Gomboc wrote: >> >>>On October 21, 1999 at 09:19:11, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >>> >>>>DB has a lot more knowledge than Hiarcs does. Also, DB was searching a lot more >>>>than the 14-ply that Joshua was saying - it searched 14 + 30(+) ply in most >>>>interesting lines. It's really difficult to determine an accurate 'depth' most >>>>of the time, because for each program it will be different, based on the number >>>>of extensions done. Hiarcs probably extends more than most other micro >>>>programs, but DB does a lot more even. >>> >>>IIRC, Amir once said that Junior extends even more aggressively than DB. >>>Unfortunately, he didn't get any quantitative evidence or examples. >> >>I think that common sense can show that this can't be true. >> >>At 200M NPS, why was DB getting 'only' 12-14 ply in 3 minutes/move? The reason >>is that all the rest of it was extensions. >> >>At 200k NPS (or whatever it is Junior gets - Even at 400k, it is still 500x >>slower than DB), how many ply can it get in 3 minutes/move? 10 ply? 11? (I >>really don't know, so someone please enlighten me. :) > > >From my experience it usually does not do more than 8 plies brute force in >middle game positions. >It may need some hours to get 10-11 brute force plies depth. I guess I stand corrected. :) Thanks. Jeremiah
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.