Author: blass uri
Date: 10:28:39 10/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 1999 at 11:49:25, Tord Romstad wrote: >On October 22, 1999 at 04:59:12, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On October 21, 1999 at 23:33:20, Paulo Soares wrote: >> >>>I don't know any chess program that is good in this type >>>of analysis. >> >>I know a few ! >>Hiarcs, Shredder, ChessTiger, Rebel, Mchess... >> >> >>> All they make the same mistakes that Fritz6 did in >>>the example that you presented. If you want good analyses, use >>>the procedure man+machine, and for this better is " Infinite Analyses " >>>of the ChessBase engines. >> >>?? the results have been made using infinite analysis. >>thats what i am talking about, that it makes not much sense >>to let fritz-like programs compute a long time on a move, >>since the result is not trustable only ONE ply after >>the long-analysis. > >IMHO, letting a chess program analyse a single position for several hours >is almost a complete waste of time --- no matter which program you use. >Any reasonably strong human chess player would obtain _much_ better analysis, >tactically as well as positionally, if they use the computer in a less passive >way. sometimes you cannot use the computer in an active way for example when you sleep so if you have an important game to analyze and do not want to waste time you should use the program for part of the time in a passive way. The way to go is to move the pieces around on the board, trying out >different candidate moves and variations, while the program runs in analysis >mode. The chess program should be used only to find forced tactical >sequences. I disagree they can be used also to find some positioanl ideas. >Trusting the eval of the program without carefully examining >the principal variation and looking at the resulting positions is about >the most stupid thing to do. I agree that it is not the best thing to do but it is not the most stupid thing to do. not using the computer or using it only to check that you did not blunder(assuming that you are not a very strong player) is more stupid thing to do. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.