Author: blass uri
Date: 15:47:52 10/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 1999 at 17:48:34, Thorsten Czub wrote: >i do not say that one should use computer-programs this way. >all i say is that i guess many newbies in computerchess >(and during my experience i have met many) normally use >chess programs that way. >they trust in deep search depths. >they let the programs compute overnight. >i wanted to show WHY these programs have IMO problems >to create a sensefull idea in a chess game, >because their main line has no "feature" to >create sensefull planned main-lines. >the main-line or evaluation is to a certain degree, senseless. > >there are other programs. they try to behave initiative and >force a plan as good as the opponent allows it. > >i know the weaknesses of chess-programs. >but how many people buy firtz6 and do NOT know ? I believe that not many buy Fritz6. I do not buy Fritz programs after Fritz5 before it is clear that they improve it. I do not buy versions of Genius after Genius3 for the same reason. I see no reason to buy Fritz6 when it is not clear if it is better than previous versions of fritz. I think they would do better not to release a new program before they are sure that they have a clear improvement. Junior6 will be a clear improvement above Junior5(not only in the level of play but also for analysis because it can learn by position and You can go forward and backward and the program is going to improve the knowledge of the root position). Maybe the programmers of Fritz like you too much and after they read that you are happy that they lost they do not want you to be sad)) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.