Author: Georg v. Zimmermann
Date: 07:35:15 10/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 1999 at 10:03:56, blass uri wrote: >On October 24, 1999 at 09:24:24, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: > >>I'm collecting tactical positions many computer programs can't solve. Not >>because they can't get enough plys deep but because they don't get the idea. > >It is not because they do not get the idea but because of the fact that many >programs are null movers > Which well known programs arn't null movers? I think there are certainly tactical positions which progs don't evaluate correctly not because of the null move problem. >If you are interested in simple positions that null movers cannot solve I >suggest you buy a book of chess problems and chess studies. I have about 20 of those and acess to many more. But maybe someone already has some good examples so that I don't need to find them myself ? > >You will find many cases when there is no threat and the side to move is losing >because it must move. hey, I _can_ play chess. No need for an explanation there.;-) > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.