Author: Peter Kappler
Date: 12:35:00 10/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 1999 at 12:09:32, James Swafford wrote: >On October 24, 1999 at 10:34:09, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On October 24, 1999 at 02:28:24, Havergal Brian wrote: >> >>>On October 23, 1999 at 18:43:56, James Swafford wrote: >>> >>>>K6-2 400 mhz, 128 mb sdram, Win2000 Professional Beta >>>> >>>>after d=7: >>>>time: 26.519000 sec., nodes=1557668, NPS = 58737.810626 >>>> >>>>-- >>>>James >>> >>> >>>I noticed no gain in 32 bit processing speed between win98 and win2K. >>>It appears to be the same. >> >> >>Why did you expect a gain? The OS has nothing to do with it... >> >> >> Christophe > >A while back, a bunch of ran an experiment with TSCP. >For some reason, my results seemed to be "too good." >I was running NT 4 WS. I know the OS shouldn't be >that big of a deal, but something was clearly different >about my configuration. > >I can't remember who was maintaining that list - probably >either Will or Dan. Could somebody please repost the list? >I'd like to compare my past results with this one... > >-- >James Hi James, Will just posted the list a few days ago. If you select the "7-day" filter option, I'm sure you'll find it. And yes, your time on the K6-2/400 result still has me baffled. :-) --Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.