Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: WAC 8

Author: William Bryant

Date: 19:54:00 10/24/99

Go up one level in this thread


On October 24, 1999 at 12:55:22, James Robertson wrote:

>r4q1k/p2bR1rp/2p2Q1N/5p2/5p2/2P5/PP3PPP/R5K1 w - - bm Rf7; id WAC008;
>
>My program has always solved WAC 8 easily. But last night I noticed the latest
>version chose Nf7+ instead of Rf7. I looked at the position with Crafty 16.18,
>and it gives mate in 7 after Rf7. After Nf7+, Crafty gives mate in 10 on ply 12,
>so this value may not be trustworthy.
>
>Can anyone look at the position and find out how far Nf7+ really is from mate?
>
>James


Jumping on this thread late,

James, mate positions in the hash table can be tricky.  My first problems were
with the program never choosing the shortest path to mate. Bruce is an advocate
of only storing bounds -not- distance to mate in the hash table.  Bob, just the
opposite.

If you were solving this before your latest 'change'.  See if the change affects
your hash table and therefore starts leading you for a longer mate.

William
wbryant@ix.netcom.com



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.