Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 22:38:23 10/25/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 1999 at 22:49:32, Jerry wrote: >A noplay list of 34 is indeed incredible, even for the offense of attitude... >Didn't think crafty was so thin skinned. I don't see anything wrong with that list. Bob's been on there for four years, at that rate he's adding one guy every little less than two months, which is pretty tolerant, I think. If you have an agenda please make it explicit. Do you have an account on ICC? If so, what's its handle? Maybe I have you noplay'd too, my noplay list has more entries than Bob's. Bob's always played against my program, he's always encouraged me to play more, and he's never even hinted that he wishes I wouldn't play mine against his. I don't let mine play against human cheaters either. Some of those guys are perverse, and it's really unpleasant to deal with, as well as being a big waste of time. Some of the computers are pretty annoying, too, for instance Mofongo only plays zero-increment fast games against humans (+noplay computer), and only plays unrated when his blitz rating gets huge, but he asked me if I wouldn't mind letting him do some 2 0 against my program. His bullet rating is 2684 and mine is 2960, so basically what this amounts to is that he's simply asking for free points. I don't care about the points, but I don't need to deal with weird situations like that, either, where some guy is primping himself in one rating category while trying to cherry pick in another. I could go on at length about that guy. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.