Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 16:58:48 07/05/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 05, 1998 at 10:03:07, blass uri wrote:
>On July 04, 1998 at 15:21:07, Leon Stancliff wrote:
>
>>To anyone interested,
>>
>> Some of you may be interested in an extended number of games the Hiarcs 6
>>program has played against Crafty and several of his descendants. Interestingly,
>>the total points comes out dead even. Hiarcs 6 was playing game in 5 minutes
>>while the opponents were playing at game in 15 minutes. This is because the
>>moves for Hiarcs must be entered manually, requiring about 10 seconds per move.
>>Scores were as follows:
>>Hiarcs vs Crafty 6.0 4.0
>>Hiarcs vs JPCrafty 3.5 6.5
>>Hiarcs vs K6-Krafty 5.5 4.5
>>Hiarcs vs Moonshot 4.5 5.5
>>Hiarcs vs Moonbeam 6.0 4.0
>>Hiarcs vs Singacrafty 5.0 5.0
>>Hiarcs vs Data 4.5 5.5
>>Hiarcs vs Ajax1 5.0 5.0
>>
>>Total Score Hiarcs 6 40.0 Crafty & Clones 40.0
>>
>>Make of this whatever you will.
>>Leon Stancliff
>1)what was the hardware used by crafty and hiarch?
>
>2)I think for entering moves manually 2 seconds per move are enough
>and you do not need 10 seconds per move.
>
>Uri
I don't think so. When I operate manually my program, and assuming I'm in good
shape, I need 4 seconds per move at least. Remember you have to
1) type into your program the move your opponent has just played
2) when your program has moved, type the move to your opponent
If you operate with a mouse, this could be a little faster. Say you will only
need 3 seconds per move. If you don't have to type your move to your opponent
but instead have to move the piece on a real board, it is approx. the same.
But 2 seconds is, in my opinion, impossible.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.