Author: Amir Ban
Date: 06:06:08 10/26/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 1999 at 01:38:23, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On October 25, 1999 at 22:49:32, Jerry wrote: > >>A noplay list of 34 is indeed incredible, even for the offense of attitude... >>Didn't think crafty was so thin skinned. > >I don't see anything wrong with that list. Bob's been on there for four years, >at that rate he's adding one guy every little less than two months, which is >pretty tolerant, I think. > >If you have an agenda please make it explicit. Do you have an account on ICC? >If so, what's its handle? Maybe I have you noplay'd too, my noplay list has >more entries than Bob's. > >Bob's always played against my program, he's always encouraged me to play more, >and he's never even hinted that he wishes I wouldn't play mine against his. > >I don't let mine play against human cheaters either. Some of those guys are >perverse, and it's really unpleasant to deal with, as well as being a big waste >of time. > >Some of the computers are pretty annoying, too, for instance Mofongo only plays >zero-increment fast games against humans (+noplay computer), and only plays >unrated when his blitz rating gets huge, but he asked me if I wouldn't mind >letting him do some 2 0 against my program. His bullet rating is 2684 and mine >is 2960, so basically what this amounts to is that he's simply asking for free >points. I don't care about the points, but I don't need to deal with weird >situations like that, either, where some guy is primping himself in one rating >category while trying to cherry pick in another. > >I could go on at length about that guy. > >bruce Bruce, Being one of those on the list of 34, I could easily find your post offensive. Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.