Author: James Swafford
Date: 15:37:14 10/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 1999 at 12:04:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 26, 1999 at 19:52:55, James Swafford wrote: > [snip] >> >>Not the prettiest, but it works. I can't see how anybody's >>would be significantly different. >> >>-- >>James > > >Look at the "COMPACT_ATTACKS" stuff in crafty. It is _far_ different. >almost to the point of being impossible to understand. In any case, your 64 >bit attack bitmaps aren't 64 bits in crafty... they are much shorter. They take >more instructions to generate moves, but much less memory bandwidth, which is >more important on the PC. If it's more important on the PC to conserve memory bandwidth, why don't you do something similar? -- James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.