Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 08:37:37 11/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 1999 at 03:05:49, Christophe Theron wrote: >On October 31, 1999 at 21:50:25, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>Here is what I do in a typical week: I edit and compile and debug (using a >>GUI debugger or a text debugger depending on 'mood') C programs. I write >>papers using a text formatter. I edit graphical images. I run a browser >>to prowl the net looking for things. I access many sites via anonymous ftp, >>as well as provide anonymous ftp for everyone wanting the crafty stuff and >>Eugene's stuff. I handle about 50 email messages per day, and run an email >>client with folders, capable of replying to email or postint to usenet depending >>on how the email was delivered. I read usenet news daily and post to it. I >>run Java applets. I run network monitoring tools. That is a part of a week's >>activities. I play music CDs on my sound system thru my computer. I run xboard >>to access ICC and to allow crafty to play there. >> >>The software I use to do all that cost me $2.95 to get a redhat 6.0 CD from >>cheapbytes. How much did you pay for _your_ software? > > >The question of the price is indeed interesting. > >As we have seen recently, a commercial program running on PII-300 (Chess Tiger >12.0) has won a match against Crafty running on PIII-500. > >So in short you get more strength from >* a PII-300 + commercial program >than from >* a PIII-500 + Crafty 16.18 > >Given the difference in price between these hard/soft combinations, I say that >to reach a given strength, the commercial program is CHEAPER than Crafty. > >This is true for other commercial programs as well, Tiger is just an example. I like how you conveniently include only computer vs. computer, which is what Tiger is tuned for. If you play matches vs. humans, you will find that Crafty is at least as good as Tiger, even on equal hardware. Probably better.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.