Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:34:26 11/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 1999 at 16:48:50, walter irvin wrote: >On November 01, 1999 at 09:01:19, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On November 01, 1999 at 01:02:38, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On November 01, 1999 at 00:16:12, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On October 31, 1999 at 22:09:45, Jerry wrote: >>>> >>>>>Congratulations to Amir Ban's program 'ban' "Junior 5" ahead of a quad xeon >>>>>"Crafty" in blitz rating on ICC. Incredible... >>>>>Seems Crafty is not noplaying him anymore. >>>> >>>> >>>>Sorry, but your "troll" is wrong. Crafty and Ban won't play again. Crafty's >>>>rating dropped because I broke a couple of serious things in the eval last >>>>weekend, one being the 'bad trade' code. I have not felt like fooling with it >>>>to fix it, so its rating has continued to drop, steadily. And will likely >>>>continue to do so until way late tonight or tomorrow some time when I fix what >>>>is wrong. >>>> >>>>If you'd stop trolling, and do your homework, Crafty has been at 3100-3200 >>>>for several weeks, during which "ban" was playing it regularly. Had no harmful >>>>effect on its rating whatsoever. Until I managed to break it myself. Which I >>>>do from time to time... >>>> >>>>Now back to normal fishing mode... >>> >>>What an arrogant tone. The man just reported data and I don't see the data >>>itself denied. It's clearly against the charter of CCC. You should be an >>>example instead of humiliating people. >>> >>>Ed >> >>Ed, wake up. This guy has "trolled" from day one. If I sound "arrogant" >>sorry. But I _do_ get tired of 'trolls'. And this was _definitely_ a troll. >> >>If you want to see data, simply log on to ICC, type "search crafty" and see >>what happened to its rating over the past week+. _without_ playing ban ( >>except for 2 games where crafty won one and drew the other.) _then_ you will >>have data. And you will see that 'playing ban' has _zero_ to do with the >>current rating drop. _exactly_ as I said. > >when you fix crafty , what do you think would happen if a 6 game match with >junior ??? even though there would be uneven hardware at say 30 sec a move ??? >if a match like that were to happen i sure would like to see it .also i have a >program that i would like to play against crafty . its my own program Serial >Chess .my program is optimized for slower games . i run mine on a 386 25 mhz sx >. but i would like to play you 1 game at 60 15 , when you have time and when you >get it fixed . I don't know. For the last two weeks it was winning 2 of 3 roughly. For the two weeks before that it was losing about the same. I have no idea what Amir has broken and fixed, and only know what I have done. So the only real way to answer that would be a match. However, that is not something that sits high on my list after recent discussions here...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.