Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The Bickering Debate

Author: Pillsbury

Date: 22:17:13 11/01/99

Go up one level in this thread


On November 01, 1999 at 17:18:30, Steve McRiley wrote:

>On November 01, 1999 at 15:44:07, Pillsbury wrote:
>
>>On November 01, 1999 at 01:59:01, James Swafford wrote:
>>
>>>On November 01, 1999 at 01:15:27, Pillsbury wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thank you. Now what if you start selling your new version for a premium price,
>>>>and declare 6 or 7 digit figure of sales! That would be the best answer you gave
>>>>everyone around.
>>>
>>>Not everyone is motivated by money.
>>>
>>>Respectfully,
>>>James
>>
>>
>>I am talking about the customers or users here.....whether they will still be
>>prepared to pay for the program. I beleive 'YES' if the program is worth a
>>premium price! And that too millions of them! Its only a test for the program
>>and not the programmer. When faced with the bitter facts of life, the programmer
>>then will improve his program and the chess world and the customers get
>>benefitted.
>>
>>Respectfully,
>>
>>karthick
>
>Im pretty sure that if Bob would ad a 'pay for crafty what you think it is
>worth' to the people downloading it (wich he will never do) he would make a nice
>buck.
>
>/McRiley

I do not dispute when you said "you have no problem at all with money" in the
earlier response. I can see its more due to good luck than anything else after
seeing this response.

Good Luck!!!

karthick



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.