Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 09:34:43 11/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 1999 at 12:14:23, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On November 02, 1999 at 01:36:04, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>On November 01, 1999 at 09:42:26, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>I read in a paper written by Wilkins about Paradise already something >>>that can be explained as the blueprint of the nullmove. >>> >>>This article was in 1979 but very likely no one paid attention as Paradise >>>didn't win any tournament (it could not play games even). >>> >>>Also it's not using the term nullmove... ...that word was still to be invented. >> >>I paid attention. Paradise was pretty cool work, even if it plays chess that >>isn't as good a way for computers as it is for humans. >> >>Dave > >Argh, misedit. "...even if it plays chess in a way that isn't as good for >computers as it is for humans." > >Dave This fails to really capture what I meant. Let me start over. :-) I paid attention. Paradise was pretty cool work, especially because it thinks about chess in a way that's thought not to be as effective for computers as it is for humans. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.