Author: Heiko Mikala
Date: 14:04:07 11/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 1999 at 02:59:37, Shep wrote: >On November 01, 1999 at 03:44:49, Didzis Cirulis wrote: > >I have just finished my 10-game series CT12 vs. F6 at 30/game (2xPIII-550), >and Tiger won impressively 8.5:1.5. >(Games will be posted later.) >However, if you remove doubles, it's only 6.5:1.5 because games #7 and #9 were >identical to #5. That's impressive indeed! As you know, I played a tournament (g/60 on 2xIBM 6x86MX PR-300) with F6 against Hiarcs 7.32, CM6000, Rebel Century, MChess Pro 8 and Genius 5, and I found Fritz play very impressive then. I think it could be a bit more aggressive, but it's tactical abilities are huge. If Chess Tiger is so much ahead of F6, oh my god... What were your impressions of the games, what do you think was the main reason for Tiger to win? Was it tactical superiority? Or did Tiger win mainly by playing agressive king-attacks which F6 couldn't handle? Clear mistakes by Fritz? I'm looking forward to see the games! Greetings Heiko.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.