Author: Howard Exner
Date: 19:48:58 11/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 1999 at 07:02:46, Jouni Uski wrote: >No, sorry. But all positions seems to be correct... > >Jouni Here are some lines: 1. Bxg6 hxg6 2. Re7+ Rxe7 3. dxe7+ Kxe7 4. Rd8 1. Nxd6 Rxf3 2. Nxe8 Bxb2 3. Qxb2+ Kg8 4. Rd8 Rf8 5. Rxc8 Rxe8 6. Rxe8+ Qxe8 7. Qe2 Qd8 8. Bxe4 1. Nxh7 Kxh7 2. Qh4+ Kg8 3. Bg5 Re8 4. Re3 Rxc3 5. Rh3 Kf8 6. Qh7 1... Rxb2 2. Kxb2 Ba3+ 3. Kxa3 Rb8 1. Rd5 cxd5 2. Nh5 Bg4 3. Qxg4 g6 4. Nhf6+ Bxf6 5. Nxf6+ Kh8 6. Qh4 1. Rxd6 Qxd6 2. Rd1 Qb8 3. Bxd7 Nxd7 4. Qh4+ Kg8 5. Rxd7 Bxf3 6. Nd5 Qe5 7. Nf6+ 1. Rxg6 Nxg6 2. Bg5 Qf7 3. Qh2 Rfe8 4. Qh7+ Kf8 5. Bxg6 Qg8 6. Qh3 Re7 7. Bxe7+ Kxe7 8. Qh4+ 1. Rxf6 Rxf6 2. Rd7 Rg6 3. Qe7 Qc8 4. Qf7+ Kh8 5. e7 Qg8 6. Qxg8+ Rxg8 7. Ne4 The Rxh2 problem looks suspect. It's not in the ECM98 suite which means Amir, Bruce or myself found some flaw(usually a better defense than the one originally recorded in the ECM book).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.