Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 01:25:20 11/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 03, 1999 at 03:56:06, Martin Grabriel wrote: >(Just a suggestion): >1) Moderators should be given the right to delete posts which are offending or >against the charter. (everyone will and must agree to this Step 1). This is already what they do now. This is what the moderators are here for. > >2) Moderators should not explain or give warning (publicly or by email) about >the deletion. Most deletions by the moderators do not give any public or email response now anyway. > >Step 2 will help avoid many counter-arguments, fistfights, etc with moderators. >Posters would not then take your act of deletion so personally. Reasons: (a) >Nobody likes to be `warned' >(b) Everybody wants to have the last say. So it is prudent for moderators to >just delete and not explain. What we usually have is then someone who has had a post deleted, posting on asking why the hell was it deleted. So most of your points are already done now, and unless you want to rule with a iron fist and let moderators delete what they want without any limits, then block anyone from complaining, then I would think you would have a very nasty place to be.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.