Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: assembler vs. C

Author: Geoff Bull

Date: 18:08:47 11/03/99

Go up one level in this thread


On November 02, 1999 at 13:04:38, Bruce Moreland wrote:

Isn't C often referred to as "portable assembler" anyway?

>If you are trying to develop a chess program, use C.

C is not the only language in the world.

> You will spend a
>tremendous amount of time fixing bugs, changing data structures, and changing
>algorithms, so you will be able to make a better program faster if you use a
>high-level language.

And if you use as higher level language than C you will spend even less time
fixing bugs, and your code will be even easier to change.

If you write it in assembler, you'll likely neve finish it!


>If you try to do otherwise it will be like putting frosting on a serving plate
>and trying to assemble a cake under it.

"We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time:
premature optimization is the root of all evil."
    - Donald Knuth

cheers
Geoff




This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.