Author: blass uri
Date: 03:28:59 11/07/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 1999 at 05:33:40, Harald Faber wrote: >On November 06, 1999 at 17:52:42, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>>What excuses can you bring why Tiger is not leading in the Netherlands? >> >>There is no need for "excuses". >>Look in the games if you have the power to play chess yourself. >>Against quest and the king tiger trapped into a "trap". > >A TRAP that didn't work well since Tiger could draw, so there is no trap. >But very interesting this new excuse, you never used that. :-) > >>harald. what is your problem ? >>my autoplayer says now +5 =2 -0 against fritz6. >>these are 400 Mhz equal machines and 40/120 games. > >So the Netherlands Ch doesn't fit to your superior tiger results, right? Where >is it Tiger crushing all opponents? > >>>Uh, much >>>worse, even behind Fritz... >> >>it is not fritz. it is quest. fritz6 is matthias feist code. >>quest is frans morsch. >>fritz6 uses (small portions of) knowledge, frans relies on search depth and nps. > >AFAIK QUEST is the engine within Fritz6 so the only difference is the GUI. I understood from thorsten's post that the engine is not the same because fritz6 is matthias feist's code and quest is frans morsh's code. > >>>But what about Nimzo7.32 (still my favorite, go for it, Nimzo!) >>>and the King? >> >>I don't know. tiger did not lose a game or? > >But 2 points behind... In one tournament everything can happen. Junior4.5 won with 9.5 out of 11 in the microcomputer championship in paris but if you give it to play again against the same opponents then I do not expect it to do more than 7.5 out of 11. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.