Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: assembler vs. C

Author: leonid

Date: 19:58:55 11/07/99

Go up one level in this thread


On November 07, 1999 at 20:33:59, Geoff Bull wrote:

>On November 05, 1999 at 17:14:01, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>
>>On November 03, 1999 at 21:08:47, Geoff Bull wrote:
>>
>>>On November 02, 1999 at 13:04:38, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>>>>If you are trying to develop a chess program, use C.
>>>
>>>C is not the only language in the world.
>>
>>The title of the thread is "assembler vs C", so please forgive me for
>>restricting the domain to these two languages, since this is what the original
>>poster was asking about.
>>
>
>Maybe so.
>But I thought your advice was overly narrow, and maybe that it had not
>occurred to the originally poster that they had other alternatives to
>consider.
>If your advice had been:
>"If you are trying to develop a chess program, don't use assembler"
>few would disagree.
>
>GB

If you write your chess program only for fun, use every language that you could
like. But if you expect that "others" should observe your happiness, use
Assembler. Only this language will give your game extra ply over others. It will
naturally induce into your game some extra glamoring brillances able to capture
the attention of human eyes. And since the human is a social animal that crave
for attention, Assembler is the only natural language for him to express
himself.

Leonid.



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.