Author: Shep
Date: 00:59:46 11/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 1999 at 08:08:32, Alexander Kure wrote: >Disregarding the Nimzo 2000 WB Engine seems a little bit harsh to me. While it >is true that the original Winboard Engine that was shipped with the Nimzo 2000 >stand alone version is not as good as the stand alone one, I do not agree with >your "of course...". The WB Version is stronger than all of the progs you were >listing above. I do not want to prove this statement with statistical material >but invite you prove the opposite. Maybe I have to clarify what I meant by saying "Disregarding the Nimzo WB engine of course": I assumed the original poster was interested in *non-commercial* Winboard engines only (he did not say so specifically, but since Nimzo is the only commercial Winboard engine so far, most people consider "Winboard" and "free" as synonymous). That's why I did not count Nimzo among the top 5, well knowing it is very likely quite a bit stronger than the others. --- Shep
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.