Author: Jouni Uski
Date: 01:54:59 11/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 1999 at 04:20:56, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On November 08, 1999 at 04:05:45, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>To get the definitive(?) answer is selected 20 random middle game position from >>ECM suite and run all 5 minutes. After that I read NPS and finally counted >>average for program. Test was done in 450 Mhz AMD with 52 MB hash. >> >>Fritz5.32 510kNPS >>Goliath2000a 610kNPS >> >>So Goliath has beaten Fritz in pure speed and is NPS champion!! >> >>Jouni > >Most of those positions were probably tactical ones. I think Goliath uses some >very lazy-eval in these types of positions, so NPS goes way up. Try the test >using "positional" positions, and see if this is the same result. It may still >be the same thing - who knows? :) > >Jeremiah You are probably right... I have noticed, that in endgame positions Goliath's NPS goes down to 150 - 200 kNPS. Jouni
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.