Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 02:48:32 11/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 1999 at 01:30:18, Harald Faber wrote: >No problems, I simply cannot believe Tiger being 100pts over the rest. a person who BELIEVES or not believes without having any data himself is a religious person. he has nothing else than prejudices. it is ONE thing to have prejudices, but IMO another thing to defend prejudices the way YOU do it. As a communist i prefer to talk about programs i have, to talk about data i have outplayed on my own machines. And i guess Markus Kaestner would say the same. He HAS outplayed CM6 vs. Tiger as he told you. Still you do not believe , he ? I don't need to "believe" anything. I want to KNOW by facts. so - believe or not believe whatever you want. build a Haralf Faber church of NON-believers. its ok for me. but don't call what you do anything other than religious fanatics, it is not based on facts, it is based on prejudices. And you are even proud to have prejudices.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.