Author: leonid
Date: 03:05:35 11/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 1999 at 02:33:10, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On November 07, 1999 at 22:58:55, leonid wrote: > >>On November 07, 1999 at 20:33:59, Geoff Bull wrote: >> >>>On November 05, 1999 at 17:14:01, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>> >>>>On November 03, 1999 at 21:08:47, Geoff Bull wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 02, 1999 at 13:04:38, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>>>>>If you are trying to develop a chess program, use C. >>>>> >>>>>C is not the only language in the world. >>>> >>>>The title of the thread is "assembler vs C", so please forgive me for >>>>restricting the domain to these two languages, since this is what the original >>>>poster was asking about. >>>> >>> >>>Maybe so. >>>But I thought your advice was overly narrow, and maybe that it had not >>>occurred to the originally poster that they had other alternatives to >>>consider. >>>If your advice had been: >>>"If you are trying to develop a chess program, don't use assembler" >>>few would disagree. >>> >>>GB >> >>If you write your chess program only for fun, use every language that you could >>like. But if you expect that "others" should observe your happiness, use >>Assembler. Only this language will give your game extra ply over others. It will >>naturally induce into your game some extra glamoring brillances able to capture >>the attention of human eyes. And since the human is a social animal that crave >>for attention, Assembler is the only natural language for him to express >>himself. >> >>Leonid. > >In order for your program to win, first your program has to play. Writing it >from scratch in assembler is the least productive way to do this, unless your >last name happens to be Morsch. > >Dave Never mind your name if your set of mind is right. Leonid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.