Author: Harald Faber
Date: 04:33:41 11/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 1999 at 05:48:32, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>No problems, I simply cannot believe Tiger being 100pts over the rest. > >a person who BELIEVES or not believes without having any data himself >is a religious person. he has nothing else than prejudices. >it is ONE thing to have prejudices, but IMO another thing to defend >prejudices the way YOU do it. > >As a communist i prefer to talk about programs i have, to talk >about data i have outplayed on my own machines. >And i guess Markus Kaestner would say the same. He HAS >outplayed CM6 vs. Tiger as he told you. >Still you do not believe , he ? I have never heard of his results. >I don't need to "believe" anything. I want to KNOW by facts. > >so - believe or not believe whatever you want. >build a Haralf Faber church of NON-believers. > >its ok for me. but don't call what you do anything other than >religious fanatics, it is not based on facts, it is based >on prejudices. And you are even proud to have prejudices. It is based on facts and on experience. Facts like Paderborn and the NL-Ch. PUBLIC games and PUBLIC played! And experience that no amateur entered the scene 100pts above since I follow computerchess some years ago.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.